Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Professor's Work Shows People Power Trumps Violence

NARCO NEWS May 23, 2012 | Issue #67


Publisher: Al Giordano


Professor’s Work Shows People Power Trumps Violence

Erica Chenoweth’s Research Is Taking the Bang out of Armed Struggles


By Jenny Gustafsson

School of Authentic Journalism, class of 2012

May 21, 2012


When Erica Chenoweth was 13 years old, her mother gave her the diary of Bosnian Zlata Filipovic. This was in the early 1990s, and Zlata was thirteen just like Chenoweth.


In Filipovic’s diary, which she called “Mammy,” she had written about the horrors she experienced in wartime Sarajevo. After reading the book, Chenoweth knew that she wanted to work with solving conflicts. Today, almost 20 years later, she has made the first study to show that nonviolent resistance is a more effective tool than armed insurgency.


In between Chenoweth as a teenager and Chenoweth promoting civil resistance are several years of Chenoweth as a conventional political scholar.


“I used to study people who challenge states through using force — a very sexy topic,” she says. “I thought it would land me a good job.”


Professor Erica Chenoweth discussed her recently published, groundbreaking book on civil resistance at the 2012 School of Authentic Journalism, held in late March in Mexico.DR 2012 Noah Friedman-Rudovsky, Narco News.


Chenoweth, now an assistant professor of government at Wesleyan University (and about to make the move to the University of Denver), used to study terrorism and warfare — just about as far from civil and nonviolent struggle as you can get. “I was riding the wave of people wanting to study terrorism after 9/11,” she says, “trying to challenge the foreign policies of the Bush administration using its own propaganda to attack it.”


Then, in 2006, something happened. Chenoweth went to a conference in Colorado called People Power and Pedagogy. The event, organized by the Washington, D.C.-based International Center for Nonviolent Conflict (ICNC), was about strategic nonviolent action and how it can be a tool for political action.


“I was really bothered at that conference,” Chenoweth says. “They were saying that nonviolence works, which was a new claim to me. There was no comparative study saying that. In my field, the current was that the more violent and bloody it is, the more likely it is to succeed. That’s pretty contradictory to what the ICNC people were saying.”


Taking on the Challenge


Long-time nonviolent action scholar Stephen Zunes is one of ICNC’s board members, and was a speaker at the Colorado conference.


“I met Erica for the first time at that conference,” he says. “She comes from a totally different point of view. Most of us in the field come out of the Left or of different social movements.”


“But not Chenoweth,” Zunes continues. “She’s very mainstream, with a conventional education. To study nonviolence was an idea that came accidentally to her.”


Case after case was brought up at the conference highlighting how nonviolence had succeeded over violent action, Chenoweth says she “was really annoying for about a week after that conference.”


She was approached by some of the speakers.


“They told me that, ‘If you’re so concerned with the issue, why don’t you do the study?’” Chenoweth recalls.


Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict (2012, Columbia University Press) is the book by Chenoweth and co-author Maria Stephan that measures the success or failure of more than 300 struggles over the past century.


So, she took on the challenge. “I wanted to do something that wasn’t easy in the way that my previous work researching terrorism was.”


“I didn’t have to go through internal struggles doing that,” Chenoweth says. “There was no moral dilemma.”


Together with Maria J. Stephan, Chenoweth started researching civic resistance movements between 1900 and 2006, comparing them to their violent counterparts. A book, called Why Civil Resistance Works, based on that research came out in August 2011 and presents the findings — quite groundbreaking ones — that nonviolent tactics are twice as effective as violent ones.


For someone who spent her whole academic career studying the logic of violence, working with this research meant questioning many old-established assumptions.


“In the beginning, I was very skeptical,” Chenoweth says. “Now, it has totally changed how I look at my field. I realize that many of those who are committed to violence are doing so for the wrong reasons. They think that it works.”


Alien Conversion


Ivan Marovic, who worked with nonviolent campaigns for years as one of the leaders of Serbia’s civil resistance movement that removed Slobodan Milosevic from power in 2000, is also surprised at Chenoweth’s transformation.


“When I first met Erica,” Marovic says, “she was very dismissive and skeptical — which I found refreshing. She was someone who would say, ‘I don’t buy this.’”


“I wasn’t in touch with her for a few years,” Marovic continues, “and then she shows up with this article explaining why civil resistance works. I was like: What happened? Was she abducted by aliens and replaced by someone else?”

Nonviolent campaigners — although having known for a long time that civil resistance can be effective — were previously lacking the systematic, comprehensive figures that Chenoweth and Stephan had presented.


“It’s huge to have Chenoweth,” Zunes says. “She has a quantitative approach, not a qualitative one like most nonviolence researchers have. That gives her more credibility in the mainstream. The empirical evidence that she put forward is more than anyone has ever done in our field.”


Jack DuVall, the president of ICNC, has studied and written about civil resistance for a long time. “Erica’s work is very important for several reasons,” he says. “First of all, it’s the first study of nonviolent movements under such a long period of time. It’s visionary, solid, peer reviewed.


“Then, it’s made by two women — young women,” DuVall adds. “This is important because in academia, we haven’t yet emerged from when young women were patted on the head and told to be quiet.”


DuVall continues: “There are still many alpha male activists in the world who have a romanticized idea about violence. And they really don’t like this book. It’s as if someone has rained on their parade. But it’s incidentally; she’s not trying to rain on their parade. She’s not attracted to the area because it’s cool, but because it has great explanatory power to it.”


Chenoweth explains it much the same way: “One thing that I cannot stand is when conventional wisdoms are wrong and people believe in them anyway.”


She is also cautious, she says, to always clarify that she is not motivated by ideological reasons: “I’m not a pacifist and I don’t have a dog in that fight.”


Rather, her interest is finding out what strategies work. Looking at 323 violent and nonviolent struggles in the book, she found that one factor is crucial to any campaign.


“Participation. That’s the single most important element for any successful campaign,” Chenoweth says. “For a movement to succeed, mass mobilization is required. And nonviolent movements have fewer obstacles for people to get involved. Violent campaigns are neither large enough nor diverse enough.”


Ideas Matter


As Chenoweth and Stephan were nearing the end of their work with the book, Chenoweth got a message from a colleague who told her to keep an eye on Tunisia. This was in late December 2010. A few weeks later, the president, Zine Al-Abidine Ben Ali, was ousted.


“When January 14 happened, my mind was absolutely blown,” Chenoweth says. “But I never thought at that point that it would spread. Now, I’m very encouraged by the Arab Spring. It shows that nonviolence works because people stopped obeying authorities.”


Her research has had a big impact already, only six months after the release of the book. Chenoweth has made 50 speeches all over the world, and the book was sold out in its two first rounds. The timing — right in the revolutionary year of 2011 — is certainly one contributing factor, but the more important one is that her work is unprecedented.


Says ICNC’s DuVall: “This idea that nonviolent resistance should change behavior — it has nothing to do with that. It’s not about sentiment; it’s about acquiring strength. Chenoweth has documented how to do that. That’s big. Nobody has done that before.”


But Chenoweth’s work also has caused dispute, both among scholars and outside of academia. “I expected it to be controversial in my field. I wasn’t expecting people to be happy,” Chenoweth says. “Then, I also get lots of emails — at least one a day from a person who wants to argue with me. And some are just really crazy.”


“Sometimes,” she quips, “I wish emails weren’t invented.”


Besides providing new perspectives for those who are studying and practicing civil resistance, Chenoweth’s research has had a personal impact as well.


“Sure I’ve changed during this process. I’ve found myself having more compassion during these last years,” Chenoweth says. “I’m still grappling with what my role should be in the future.


“I think I’ll do the best service just continuing with my research.” Chenoweth adds. “Now, my ideas matter to people.

Most academics don’t get that chance to change people’s lives.”


Donations can be sent to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD 21218.  Ph: 410-366-1637; Email: mobuszewski [at] Go to


"The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs


No comments: