15 November 2011 Last updated at 14:22 ET
Wikileaks' Julian Assange seeks Supreme Court hearing
Julian Assange set up the whistle-blowing website Wikileaks
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is applying to have his case against extradition to
He lost a High Court battle earlier this month to halt his removal for questioning over alleged sex offences.
Mr Assange denies raping a woman and sexually molesting another in
On 5 December he will ask the High Court to rule his case raises a question of general public importance.
Mr Assange claims his arrest, under the European Arrest Warrant (EAW), was politically motivated and linked to the activities of WikiLeaks. The website angered the
He is attempting to appeal to the Supreme Court on two grounds.
Clive Coleman BBC News legal correspondent
Julian Assange's lawyers have applied to the High Court for a certificate of law of general public importance. This is the first stage in an attempt to take his appeal against extradition to the Supreme Court.
It requires his legal team to argue the case highlights a point of law that is important and goes beyond Julian Assange the individual.
If the certificate is not granted, that's it - Julian Assange will be on a plane back to
If it is granted, then his lawyers have to seek leave to appeal either from the High Court or direct from the Supreme Court. Again, if he fails to get leave to appeal, Julian Assange will be sent to
If he is successful, a full appeal hearing would be likely to take place at the Supreme Court in around May of next year.
Mr Assange says the highest court should consider whether his extradition would be unlawful because the request was made by a "partisan prosecutor working for the executive" and whether he can be defined as "the accused" even though no decision has been taken to prosecute him.
After losing at the High Court on 2 November the 40-year-old Australian hit out against the EAW. He said: "I have not been charged with any crime in any country.
"The European arrest warrant is so restrictive that it prevents
The High Court judges rejected claims that extraditing Mr Assange would be "unfair and unlawful".
The judges, the President of the Queen's Bench Division Sir John Thomas and Mr Justice Ouseley, said that the issuing of the European arrest warrant (EAW) that led to Mr Assange's arrest and all subsequent proceedings to achieve extradition was "lawful" and "proportionate".
They upheld a decision made by District Judge Howard Riddle in February, when he ruled that Mr Assange should be extradited to face investigation following a hearing at City of
BBC © 2011
Donations can be sent to the
"The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs
Post a Comment