Saturday, April 15, 2017

Dr. Ira Helfand is speaking April 15 at PSR dinner/ Our Nuclear Folly

Please Join PSR on Saturday, April 15th, from 6 to 9 PM to Hear Dr. Ira Helfand at Its Annual Dinner
at MedChi, 1211 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD

Dear Max:

  Just a reminder that if you have not RSVP'd,  our Annual Dinner is April 15th from 6-9pm at the State Medical Society at 1211 Cathedral Street in Baltimore (please note this is a location change from some earlier announcements). This is one of our favorite events of the year. For some, it is a time to say hello and visit with old friends. For others, it is a time to learn more about Chesapeake PSR and the issues that we care most about. All are welcome at this event.

  If you have RSVP'd, thank you and we look forward to seeing you there.

 This year we are delighted to welcome as our guest speaker, Dr. Ira Helfand, co-President of the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War.  Dr. Helfand is one of the most informed and dynamic speakers in the world on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear war.  He will have an important message that we all need to hear, to think about, and to act on. Just look at the news today and you will know why this is the most important issue of our time.

  Drinks and social time are from 6:00 -7:00. A buffet dinner will start at 7:00. Dr. Helfand will begin speaking around 7:30.

More information on this dinner can be found here.

We hope you can join us at this special event!

Sincerely,

Tim Whitehouse

 Our Nuclear Folly

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, 10 April 2017

Winslow Myers | PeaceVoice – TRANSCEND Media Service
10 Apr 2017 – The well-established assumption that North Korea is our most difficult and dangerous foreign policy challenge is worth a little dispassionate examination.

   North Korea is not a fun place. If ever a nation had earned the right to be labeled collectively psychotic, it would be the Democratic Republic of North Korea under Kim Jung-un, who apparently just outsourced the bizarre assassination of his own brother. The country possesses neither a viable judiciary nor any kind of religious freedom. Famine has been a cyclical presence. Electrical power is intermittent. In 2015 North Korea ranked 115th in the world in the size of its GDP according to U.N. statistics.

    Yet nothing the United States has tried to do, including decades of diplomatic negotiations and the application of severe sanctions, has stopped this isolated conundrum of a country from strutting proudly through the exclusive doors of the nuclear club.

    But let’s get real.  As odd and alienated as North Korea may be, their leaders know perfectly well that even if the United States had not a single nuclear warhead at its disposal, if provoked we could bomb North Korea until there was nothing left but bouncing rubble. The idea that they would be so suicidally unwise as to use their nuclear weapons to launch an unprovoked first-strike attack upon the United States, or South Korea for that matter, seems utterly remote from reality.

    Instead, they are pursuing a policy—the policy of deterrence—which is a mirror image of our own. But by a collective trick of the mind, our use of weapons of mass destruction to deter is rationalized and justified by the fact that our intentions are good, while from our perspective both their intentions and their weapons are perceived to be evil—as if there were such a thing as good nuclear weapons and bad nuclear weapons.  In this particular sense, there is not a whit of difference between our otherwise two very different countries. North Korea took careful note of what happened to Libya when they agreed unilaterally to give up their nuclear program. Their motive is self-protection, not aggression.

      It is one thing to say that deterrence was a temporary (now nearly three-quarters of a century) strategy to prevent planet-destroying war. But can we go on this way forever, with all nine nuclear powers committed to never making a single error of interpretation, never having a single equipment failure, never succumbing to a single computer hack? If we think we can, we’re just as out of it as Kim Jung-un. Our bowing to the false idol of nuclear deterrence as the ultimate and permanent bedrock of international security is in its own way as delusional as the way the brainwashed citizens of North Korea give absolute obeisance to their dear leader.

     If the United States, as a responsible world player, does not move beyond the obsolete paradigm of endless paranoid cycles of we-build-they build; if it does not begin to think in terms of setting an example; if it does not begin to participate authentically in international conferences to ban these weapons, there is going to be a nuclear war in our future.

    We’re uneasy with Mr. Trump’s finger on the nuclear trigger, but this is a bigger problem than who specifically is commander in chief. When the moment comes and we begin to slide down the slippery slope of deterrence breakdown because of some completely unanticipated dissolution of “fail-safeness,” it won’t matter how experienced the human parties to the disaster might be.
Whoever is left on this small, no longer so beautiful planet, freezing under the ash clouds of nuclear winter, uselessly nursing their boils and pustules from radiation poisoning, will hate and despise us for what we didn’t do for decades, and they will be quite right.

     Because we know. We know and yet we do not act on our solemn obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. In fact the United States actively undermines legitimate efforts to outlaw nuclear weapons. We just boycotted a recent one.

     North Korea is a pariah nation led by a greedy Stalinist family. No one can say with any certainty whether they could be brought to the table to discuss abolition.  Why can’t we admit that we ourselves harbor a similar reluctance? The process of building trust, agreement and verification among the nine nuclear powers would be the most difficult diplomatic challenge ever undertaken. The only thing more difficult is the unthinkable agony of the alternative.
________________________________________________
https://www.transcend.org/tms/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/myers-Winslow-e1491572056394.jpg

Winslow Myers, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is the author of “Living Beyond War: A Citizen’s Guide.” He also serves on the Advisory Board of the War Preventive Initiative.

This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 10 April 2017.
Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Our Nuclear Folly, is included. Thank you.

supporterDonations can be sent to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD 21218.  Ph: 410-323-1607; Email: mobuszewski [at] verizon.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/


"The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs

No comments: