Showdown Looming On 'State Secrets'
Judge Threatens To Penalize
By Carrie Johnson
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
President Obama vowed last week to rein in the use of a legal privilege that allows the administration to discard lawsuits that involve "state secrets," promising that a new policy is in the works that will quell criticism by civil libertarians.
But hours after Obama's speech laid out a "delicate balance" on national security, his Justice Department was criticized by a federal judge in
The Obama administration has invoked the state-secrets privilege in resisting a lawsuit filed by an
The document amounts to "Judge Walker's enough-is-enough order," said Jon Eisenberg, an attorney for the now-defunct charity.
A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment on the judge's order, which requires the government to respond in court by Friday.
The Haramain case is one of the national security battles left over from George W. Bush's presidency. Civil liberties groups and left-leaning members of Congress have used the matter to argue that Obama's approach as president conflicts with his campaign promises of transparency.
In a speech at the National Archives on Thursday, Obama said that the administration is "nearing completion of a thorough review" of the way in which his predecessors invoked the state-secrets privilege. The president said that his lawyers would apply a stricter legal test for the kinds of material that can be protected and that the attorney general must personally sign off on any future cases involving the privilege.
"We must not protect information merely because it reveals the violation of a law or embarrasses the government," Obama said.
His words came on the heels of an appeals court ruling in late April striking down the government's use of the state-secrets privilege in a separate case, involving the "extraordinary rendition" of terrorism suspects to countries where they allegedly faced torture. A panel of the
A bill moving through the Senate, written by Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), would empower federal judges to review sensitive evidence and test government assertions. Neither the White House nor the Justice Department has taken a position on the legislation.
In the Haramain case, officials at the National Security Agency have determined that attorneys for the charity, who mistakenly received documents reflecting that they may have been the subject of government eavesdropping, do not have a "need to know" about the electronic surveillance program.
That has set Justice Department lawyers who are defending the NSA on a collision course with
© 2009 The Washington Post Company
Donations can be sent to the
"The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs