Monday, April 19, 2010

Constitution Project Expresses Disappointment in Supreme Court Refusal to Hear Case of Charles Dean Hood


April 19, 2010

5:03 PM

CONTACT: Constitution Project [1]

Matthew Allee, (202) 580-6922 or


Constitution Project Expresses Disappointment in Supreme Court Refusal to Hear Case of Charles Dean Hood

Fair trial in doubt because of affair between prosecutor and judge, says former Texas Governor Mark White and former FBI Director Judge William S. Sessions

WASHINGTON - April 19 - The Constitution Project is disappointed by the Supreme Court's refusal today to hear the case of Charles Dean Hood, who has long protested that his constitutional right to a fair trial was violated because of an admitted affair between the prosecutor in his case and the judge presiding over his trial. Mr. Hood was sentenced to death in 1990 for a double murder.

Today's decision by the Court, without explanation, in Charles Dean Hood v. State of Texas is separate from a February order by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that Mr. Hood is entitled to a new sentencing hearing. That order was based on a legal issue unrelated to the relationship between Mr. Hood's prosecutor and presiding judge.

The following statement can be attributed to former Texas Governor and Texas Attorney General Mark White, and Judge William S. Sessions, former federal judge in Texas and former Director of the FBI:

"We are disappointed that the Supreme Court today refused to hear Mr. Hood's case. It means that the manifest unfairness that occurred in Mr. Hood's case will remain unaddressed by any court, and the injustice will go unremedied. The relationship between the judge and prosecutor in this case breached every standard of fairness that we rightfully expect from our country's criminal justice system, casting grave doubt on the impartiality of the trial in this case and tarnishing the reputation of the judiciary and our criminal justice system as a whole.

"For the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and now the United States Supreme Court to show indifference to such paramount injustice, particularly in a case that resulted in the imposition of the death penalty, should be an outrage to all citizens."

In February, the Constitution Project organized an amicus brief filed in the U.S. Supreme Court on Mr. Hood's behalf, from 21 former judges, government officials, and prosecutors. Governor White and Judge Sessions were signatories to the brief.

To view a copy of the amicus brief, go to: [2]   

In September 2008, the Constitution Project organized a letter to Texas Governor Rick Perry signed by former federal and state judges and prosecutors from across the country, urging the governor to grant a reprieve for Mr. Hood, who was then slated for execution within days.

To view the letter sent to Governor Perry, go to
: [3]   


The Constitution Project is a politically independent think tank established in 1997 to promote and defend constitutional safeguards. More information about the Constitution Project is available at [4].

Constitution Project Links: Homepage [1]Constitution Project (Press Center) [5]


URL to article:


Donations can be sent to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD 21218.  Ph: 410-366-1637; Email: mobuszewski [at]


"The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs


No comments: