CITIZEN ACTIVISTS, ARRESTED
ON THE U.S. CAPITOL STEPS, APPEAR IN COURT TO ARGUE FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 11, 2016
Contacts: Malachy Kilbride 301-283-7627 or malachykilbride at yahoo.com; or Max Obuszewski 727-543-3227 or mobuszewski at verizon.net
WHO: On January 12, 2016, a group of citizen activists affiliated with the National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance marched to the U.S. Capitol, and a delegation asked a Capitol Police representative to deliver to the office of the vice-president a petition calling on President Obama to deliver a Real State of the Union. The hope was that Joe Biden could get the petition to Barack Obama, and that evening the president would present to the nation all of the problems facing this country. For example, Obama would admit that the country is plagued by income inequality, maddening militarism and the horrors of climate chaos
Contacts: Malachy Kilbride 301-283-7627 or malachykilbride at yahoo.com; or Max Obuszewski 727-543-3227 or mobuszewski at verizon.net
WHO: On January 12, 2016, a group of citizen activists affiliated with the National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance marched to the U.S. Capitol, and a delegation asked a Capitol Police representative to deliver to the office of the vice-president a petition calling on President Obama to deliver a Real State of the Union. The hope was that Joe Biden could get the petition to Barack Obama, and that evening the president would present to the nation all of the problems facing this country. For example, Obama would admit that the country is plagued by income inequality, maddening militarism and the horrors of climate chaos
However, the police
representative refused to accept the petition, but indicated he would grant a
permit to demonstrate in an area away from the Capitol steps. He was
informed that the demonstration had already taken place near the Supreme
Court. The citizen activists were there expressing their First Amendment
rights to petition the government for a redress of of grievances. Because
the citizen activists were being denied their First Amendment rights, they
gathered on the legal portion of the Capitol steps holding a banner which read
STOP THE WAR MACHINE EXPORT PEACE and sang “WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED.” Thirteen of
us were then arrested and charged with “incommoding and obstructing.”
WHAT: At an arraignment on February 3 in Superior
Court of the District of Columbia, three of the defendants appeared – Malachy
Kilbride, a Quaker from Montgomery County, Maryland, Max Obuszewski from
Baltimore, and the venerable Eve Tetaz, with a walker, from Washington, D.C.
Four defendants had their charges dismissed -- Martin Gugino from Buffalo, Phil
Runkel from Wisconsin, Janice Sevre-Duszynska from Kentucky and Trudy Silver
from New York City. The government added another charge against the nine
remaining defendants – “failure to obey.” Also the government had the judge
issue a stay-away order from the Capitol.
On
February 8, the same three defendants appeared before Judge Wendell Gardner,
Jr., and argued vociferously against a stay-away order from the Capitol. The
defendants indicated they were nonthreatening pacifists who had a
constitutional right to visit the Capitol. Judge Gardner indicated he
would rule on this issue at the status hearing on April 22.
At the
April 22 hearing, the government offered a plea agreement – charges would be
dismissed if a defendant paid $50, accepted six months of unsupervised
probation and a stay-away order from the Capitol during this time and agreed to
file no further motions. These defendants accepted the plea agreement: Carol
Gay from New Jersey, Linda LeTendre a Quaker from Saratoga Springs, New York,
Alice Sutter from New York City, and Brian Terrell a Catholic Worker from
Iowa. Three of the five remaining defendants then asked the judge to
rescind the stay-away order as they were being denied a constitutional right to
hear arguments by their elected representatives in both the House and Senate
chambers. Also a stay-away is usually reserved for violent and
threatening individuals. However, the judge ruled in favor of the
government. He said stalkers “who are not violent” receive stay-away
orders. Obviously, stalkers by their mere presence are violent individuals, but
the judge didn’t understand.
After the
defense filed a Motion to Compel Additional Discovery, Judge Gardner scheduled
a hearing. The government is opposed to releasing any more
discovery. Mark Goldstone representing Ms. Tetaz, Kilbride and Obuszewski
will argue that the government must turn over more documents and material.
WHEN and WHERE: May 12,
2016 at 11 AM in Courtroom 220, D.C. Superior Court, 500 Indiana Avenue NW,
Washington, D.C. 20001
WHY: The government turned over discovery to Kilbride, Obuszewski and Tetaz in February. It is severely lacking. For example, the police report indicates we wanted to be arrested. No, our intent was to deliver a petition.
WHY: The government turned over discovery to Kilbride, Obuszewski and Tetaz in February. It is severely lacking. For example, the police report indicates we wanted to be arrested. No, our intent was to deliver a petition.
The government DVD
given to the defendants only shows the arrests. We are seeking the
complete video taken by a Capitol Police officer which includes our request for
an officer to take our petition to the vice president’s office in the Capitol.
Also Capitol Police
officer John Gallo contacted Obuszewski on the morning of January 12 indicating
awareness of the petition delivery. So we are seeking all communications
between Gallo and other officers and other agencies. It is baffling that
the government arrested peaceful citizen activists who were engaged in
constitutionally-protected activity. Why were we arrested? Why are
five of us including Joy First from Wisconsin and Joan Nicholson a Pennsylvania
Quaker being prosecuted and facing a charge which carries a 90-day jail
sentence?
See the defendants’ Motion to Compel Additional Discovery below. The
government’s response to the motion is that the requested information is
irrelevant. It would not surprise the defense if the judge ruled in favor
of the government. At the trial scheduled for
May 23, the five defendants expect the government to present a case of you were
there, you were arrested, and therefore you are guilty as charged. The
defense will nevertheless argue that their First Amendment right to petition
the government with a redress of grievances was denied on January 12, and that
the charges should be dismissed.
########
"The
master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought
the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while
the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially
their lives." Eugene Victor Debs
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CRIMINAL DIVISION—D.C. & TRAFFIC BRANCH
DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA : Honorable Judge Wendell Gardner, Jr.
MAX OBUSZEWSKI, pro se : Court 220
MOTION TO COMPEL ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY
This matter relates to an arrest that took place on the legal area of the steps of the U.S. Capitol on January 12, 2016. The pro se defendant Max Obuszewski is facing a charge of Failure to Obey a Lawful Order 18 DCMR 2002.1 and a charge of 22-1307 Crowding, Obstructing, & Incommoding. Obuszewski is scheduled for trial on May 23, 2016.
As a pro se defendant, Obuszewski respectfully requests that an additional discovery process take place in which the government turns over all action plans, audiotapes, videotapes, documents, emails, files, photographs, police reports, transcripts of electronic transmissions which indicate prior knowledge that the defendant planned to visit an area near the U.S. Capitol on January 12, 2016 to have a Capitol Police officer deliver a petition to the office of the vice president. The same type of information would be sought during the time the delivery of the petition occurred. This would include a complete copy of the audio and video tape taken by a Capitol Police videographer. Also requested would be any documents relating to data gathered by Stingray technology. This Motion also seeks a copy of the January 12, 2016 U.S. Intelligence Report for the Capitol.
Also to be provided would be all intelligence, including action plans, amassed on the National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance, Dorothy Day Catholic Worker, Code Pink and others involved in planning the January 12, 2016 petition delivery. Finally, the defendant requests all communications to and from John Gallo of the Capitol Police relating to this petition delivery. All relevant material should be provided to the defendant two weeks prior to the trial date scheduled for May 23, 2016.
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
Max Obuszewski
431 Notre Dame Lane
Apartment 206
Baltimore, MD 21212
410-323-1607
A courtesy copy of the Motion was emailed on April 21, 2016 to
Randle T. Wilson
Assistant Attorney General
Suite 1060
Criminal Section
441 4th Street, NW, Suite 1060N
Washington, D.C. 20001
:
:v. :
Status Hearing Date April 22, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment