Appeals court OKs law giving telecom companies immunity for government’s surveillance program
By Associated Press,
A unanimous three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court ruling. The appeal concerned a case that consolidated 33 different lawsuits filed against various telecom companies, including AT&T, Sprint Nextel, Verizon Communications Inc. and BellSouth Corp. on behalf of these companies’ customers.
The plaintiffs, represented by lawyers including the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union, accuse the companies of violating the law and the privacy of its customers through collaboration with NSA on intelligence gathering.
The case stemmed from new surveillance rules passed by Congress in 2008 that included protection from legal liability for telecommunications companies that allegedly helped the
“I’m very disappointed. I think the court reaches to try to put lipstick on a pig here,” said Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who argued the case before the panel. “I think what Congress did was an abdication of its duty to protect people from illegal surveillance.”
In its ruling, the court noted comments made by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding the legal immunity’s role in helping the government gather intelligence.
“It emphasized that electronic intelligence gathering depends in great part on cooperation from private companies ... and that if litigation were allowed to proceed against persons allegedly assisting in such activities, ‘the private sector might be unwilling to cooperate with lawful government requests in the future,’” Judge M. Margaret McKeown said.
Thursday did not bring all bad news for plaintiffs challenging the government’s surveillance efforts.
In a separate opinion on Thursday, a three-judge panel of the court revived two other lawsuits that seek redress for telecom customers whose information may have been compromised by the warrantless surveillance program.
Two groups of telecom customers sued the NSA for violating their privacy by collecting Internet data from AT&T and other major telecom companies in the surveillance program authorized by President George W. Bush.
Government lawyers have moved to stop such cases, arguing that defending the program in court would jeopardize national security and expose state secrets.
The suits will be sent back to U.S. District Court in
Emails seeking comment from AT&T and the U.S. Department of Justice weren’t immediately returned.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
© The Washington Post Company
Court upholds spying law, revives suits over NSA 'dragnet'
By Michael Winter,
Updated 2d 14h ago
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today the federal government can be sued for the National Security Agency's warrantless "dragnet" of Americans' telephone conversations and e-mails.
But in a separate opinion, another three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based court upheld the 2008 law that gave telecommunications companies immunity for aiding the NSA in its hunt for terrorists.
A
STORY: NSA has massive database of Americans' phone calls
Q&A: The NSA phone record collection program
Two groups of customers sued the NSA, arguing it violated their privacy by collecting Internet data from AT&T and other big telecoms. The 9th Circuit overturned a lower-court ruling that had dismissed the suits as a "general grievance" from the public, and not an actionable claim, Wired explains.
Courthouse News Service has details on the rulings.
Copyright © 2012 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.
Donations can be sent to the
"The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment