Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. (photo: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)
A Key
Similarity Between Snowden Leak and Panama Papers: Scandal Is What's Been
Legalized
By Glenn Greenwald, The
Intercept
05 April 16
From
the start of the reporting based on Edward Snowden’s leaked document
archive, government defenders insisted that no illegal behavior was
revealed. That was always false: Multiple courts have now found the domestic
metadata spying program in violation of the Constitution and
relevant statutes and have issued similar rulings for other mass surveillance programs;
numerous articles on NSA and GCHQ documented the targeting of people and groups for blatantly political or legally impermissible purposes; and the leak
revealed that President Obama’s top national security official (still), James
Clapper, blatantly lied when
testifying before Congress about the NSA’s activities — a felony.
But
illegality was never the crux of the scandal triggered by those NSA
revelations. Instead, what was most shocking was what had been legalized: the
secret construction of the largest system of suspicionless spying in human history. What was
scandalous was not that most of this spying was against the law, but rather
that the law — at least as applied and interpreted by the Justice Department
and secret, one-sided FISA “courts” — now permitted the U.S. government
and its partners to engage in mass surveillance of entire populations,
including their own. As the ACLU’s Jameel Jaffer put it after the Washington
Post’s publication of documents showing NSA analysts engaged in
illegal spying: “The ‘non-compliance’ angle is important, but don’t get carried
away. The deeper scandal is what’s legal, not what’s not.”
Yesterday, dozens of newspapers around the world reported
on what they are calling the Panama Papers: a gargantuan leak of documents from
a Panama-based law firm that specializes in creating offshore shell companies.
The documents reveal billions of dollars being funneled to offshore tax havens
by leading governmental and corporate officials in numerous countries (the
U.S. was oddly missing from the
initial reporting, though journalists vow that will change shortly).
Some
of these documents undoubtedly reveal criminality: either monies that were
illegally obtained (and are being hidden for that reason) or assets being
concealed in order to criminally evade tax debts. But the crux of this activity
— placing assets offshore in order to avoid incurring tax liability — has been
legalized. That’s because Western democracies, along with overt tyrannies, are
typically controlled by societies’ wealthiest, and laws are enacted to serve
their interests. Vox’s Matt Yglesias this morning published a very good explainer of various aspects of
this leak and he makes that point clear:
Even
as the world’s wealthiest and most powerful nations have engaged in
increasingly complex and intensive efforts at international cooperation to
smooth the wheels of global commerce, they have willfully chosen to allow the
wealthiest members of Western society to shield their financial assets from
taxation (and in many cases divorce or bankruptcy settlement) by taking
advantage of shell companies and tax havens.
If
Panama or the Cayman Islands were acting to undermine the integrity of the
global pharmaceutical patent system, the United States would stop them. But the
political elite of powerful Western nations have not acted to
stop relatively puny Caribbean nations from undermining the integrity of the
global tax system — largely because Western economic elites don’t want them to.
…
… But
even though various criminal money-laundering schemes are the sexiest possible
use of shell companies, the day-to-day tax dodging is what really pays the
bills. As a manager of offshore bank accounts told me years ago, “People think
of banking secrecy as all about terrorists and drug smugglers, but the truth is
there are a lot of rich people who don’t want to pay taxes.” And the system
persists because there are a lot of politicians in the West who don’t
particularly want to make them. …
…
Incorporating your hedge fund in a country with no corporate income tax even
though all your fund’s employees and investors live in the United States is
perfectly legal. So is, in most cases, setting up a Panamanian shell company to
own and manage most of your family’s fortune.
Tax
avoidance is an inevitable feature of any tax system, but the reason this
particular form of avoidance grows and grows without bounds is that powerful
politicians in powerful countries have chosen to let it happen. As the global
economy has become more and more deeply integrated, powerful countries have
created economic “rules of the road” that foreign countries and multinational
corporations must follow in order to gain lucrative market access.
Proving
that certain behavior is “legal” does not prove that it is ethical or just.
That’s because corrupted political systems, by definition, often protect and
legalize exactly the behavior that is most unjust. Vital journalism does not
only expose law breaking. It also highlights how corrupted political and legal
systems can be co-opted by the most powerful in order to legally sanction
atrocious and destructive behavior that serves their interests,
typically with little or no public awareness that it’s been done.
In
such cases, as Jaffer put it, “The deeper scandal is what’s legal, not what’s
not.” The key revelation is not the illegality of the specific behavior in
question but rather the light shined on how our political systems function and
for whose benefit they work. That was true of the Snowden leak, and it’s true
of the Panama Papers as well.
C 2015 Reader Supported News
Donations can be sent
to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD
21218. Ph: 410-323-1607; Email: mobuszewski [at] verizon.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/
"The master class
has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.
The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject
class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives."
Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment