Wednesday, May 13, 2009

CIA Outsourced Development of Interrogation Plan

TORTURE BUSINESS

 

CIA Outsourced Development of Interrogation Plan

 

By John Goetz and Britta Sandberg

Spiegel (Germany)

May 12, 2009

 

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,624432-2,00.html

 

The torture practices used in interrogations of al-

Qaida prisoners were not developed by government

officials in Washington, but by private security

experts. In return for a daily consulting fee, they

personally supervised the program at the CIA's secret

prisons from the very beginning.

 

James Mitchell's new life begins with the same ritual

every morning: He goes jogging, wearing Adidas shorts

and a black tank top, his iPod in his ear. Then he gets

into his luxury SUV and drives back to luxury home on

Lake Vienna Drive in Pasco County, Florida.

 

The hacienda-style house, with a natural stone façade,

columned walkways and palm trees in front of the door

is brand-new. Mitchell has just had it built, in the

midst of an upscale, gated community.

 

The freestanding garage to the right of the house is

big enough for three or four cars, and a mountain bike

is mounted to the back of the SUV. Mitchell, a tanned

man in his late 50s with silver-gray hair, a neatly

trimmed beard and trendy sunglasses, spends two hours a

day exercising. In fact, exercise plays an important

role in his new life under Florida's blue skies.

 

Mitchell is the man who, on the behalf of the

administration of former President George W. Bush,

developed the rules of the program that was somewhat

shamefacedly referred to as "special interrogation

techniques" and was authorized by the president in the

summer of 2002. In truth, Mitchell developed a torture

manual. His client was the CIA. The American foreign

intelligence agency has engaged in its own share of

dubious practices over the years, activities it

initially treated as praiseworthy and would later come

to bitterly regret. But now it has become clear that

the CIA, ironically enough, outsourced its torture

practices in interrogations during the darkest years of

the Bush administration. It entrusted the development

and supervision of these interrogations to a private

security firm run by James Mitchell and his partner, Bruce Jessen.

 

The two psychologists, who had never even conducted an

interrogation before -- in other words, two amateurs --

were largely responsible for developing the CIA's

prisoner interrogation program. The recently published

report of the Committee on Armed Services of the US

Senate came out with new proof and details about this

collaboration, ABC News succeeded in filming both

Jessen and Mitchell who both refused to answer any

questions concerning their past saying that they were

not allow to speak about it.

 

WASHINGTON, DECEMBER 2001

 

Three months after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,

2001, Bush drove the Taliban out of Afghanistan and

assigned the task of interrogating senior al-Qaida

prisoners to the CIA. The agency, which had little

experience with interrogation, turned to officials at

the Defense Department for help. They, in turn,

contacted the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency, a

division of the Defense Department responsible for

Americans captured abroad and the US Army's secret SERE

training program.

 

SERE, which stands for Survival, Evasion, Resistance,

Escape, is a program designed to prepare US soldiers,

especially pilots, for situations after being taken

prisoner. In various training seminars, they learn how

to improve their ability to withstand mistreatment by

the enemy and, in the worst case, torture.

 

Most of the methods are based on experiences from the

Korean War. During SERE training, US soldiers are

stripped naked, exposed to extreme temperatures and

loud music and thrown against walls. They are kept in

so-called stress positions for hours and were also

subjected to waterboarding, at least until 2007.

 

The CIA request for possible new interrogation methods

also reached James Mitchell. He had worked as a

military psychologist for years and had trained

soldiers in the SERE program. Mitchell deserves a lot

of credit in this area, says US Air Force Colonel

Steven Kleinman. "If he had kept on doing what he was

doing, you could even have said that he did a lot for

his country. Unfortunately, no one stopped him after that."

 

Getting Involved in the War on Terror When Mitchell

learned of the inquiry coming from Washington, he had

already been retired from the military for six months.

For the first time in his life, he had founded his own,

small company: Knowledge Works, a consulting company,

at least on paper. He was clearly happy to accept new

customers and contracts.

 

SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, EARLY 2002.

 

Around the beginning of 2002, Mitchell contacted an old

colleague who was still working in the SERE training

program as Senior Psychologist. Bruce Jessen was in his

early 50s at the time and married with one son. Both

Mitchell and Jessen are Mormons. And both men, say

colleagues, are deeply religious and ardent patriots --

like so many Mormons.

 

Mitchell asked Jessen for help. He wanted him to review

the al-Qaida resistance training methods. Afterwards,

the two men wrote an initial recommendation of measures

designed to break the resistance of al-Qaida prisoners.

On Feb. 12, 2002 they sent the paper to JPRA Commander

Colonel John "Randy" Moulton who forwarded it to his

chain of command at JFCOM.

 

In April, they presented their first draft, "The

Exploitation Draft Plan," of a new interrogation

program to the CIA and proposed that an "exploitation

facility" should be established. The draft already

included some of the methods that have since come to

light, including sleep deprivation, the use of physical

violence and waterboarding. According to someone who

was involved in the program at the time, both Mitchell

and Jessen were eager to get involved in the War on

Terror as advisors to the CIA. And the CIA? According

to the informant, it was seeking scientific and

psychological justification for what it intended to do.

 

FAISALABAD, PAKISTAN, MARCH 28, 2002

 

At 2 a.m., FBI agents and Pakistani police units raided

a two-story house on the outskirts of the city,

arresting Abu Zubaydah, an al-Qaida logistics expert.

The Americans had their most important prisoner to

date. At the time, they believed that Abu Zubaydah was

the number-four man in the al-Qaida hierarchy.

 

The arrest of Abu Zubaydah was the source of great

nervousness in Washington. "Now that we had an

undoubted resource in our hands -- the highest-ranking

al-Qaida official captured to date -- we opened

discussions within the National Security Council as to

how to handle him, since holding and interrogating

large numbers of al-Qaida operatives has never been

part of our plan," former CIA Director George Tenet

later wrote in his memoir. "We wondered what we could

legitimately do to get that information."

 

A number of meetings and presentations followed,

attended by Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, National

Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and CIA Director

Tenet and his deputy. Tenet explained that, after

careful study, the CIA had concluded that the only way

to obtain the details of the terrorist organization's

future plans from al-Qaida fanatics was to use the SERE

methods. Tenet assured the group that these

interrogation practices had already been tested in the

training of thousands of Americans.

 

But someone should have told the Washington politicians

about the many warnings the Defense Department had

received from half a dozen SERE trainers. In a letter

written in December, Air Force Lieutenant Colonel

Daniel Baumgartner, who oversaw SERE training, had

already requested that the program's methods should not

be used in interrogations. Baumgartner noted that they

were "less reliable" and could in fact achieve the

opposite of the intended effect, that is, increase a

prisoner's resistance. He also warned they would have

an "intolerable public and political backlash when discovered."

 

On March 29, 2002, a day after the Zubaydah arrest,

James Mitchell closed Knowledge Works, the company he

had just founded. He and Bruce Jessen, who would resign

from military service a few months later, founded a new

company, Mitchell Jessen & Associates. The men became

contractors for the CIA, charging a rate of $1,000

(?746) a day, not including special fees.

 

CIA SECRET PRISON IN THAILAND, APRIL 2002

 

Only a few days after his arrest, Zubaydah, a

Palestinian born in Saudi Arabia, was flown to a CIA

secret prison in Thailand, accompanied by FBI agents.

One of the FBI men, Ali Soufan, a native of Lebanon and

a Muslim who speaks fluent Arabic, moved to the United

States in 1987. In 2000, he was involved in an

investigation of al-Qaeda's role in the attack on the

USS Cole, an American destroyer, in Yemen.

 

Soufan, in his early 30s at the time, was an advocate

of the traditional FBI strategy known as "rapport

building," which is based on the notion that an

interrogation can only produce the desired results once

a rapport has been developed with the prisoner. Soufan

dressed the fresh gunshot wounds Zubaydah had received

during the arrest. He told Zubaydah that he even knew

the nickname he had been given by his mother.

 

For seven years, Soufan remained silent about his role

in the interrogation in Thailand. But last week he

decided to give an exclusive interview to Newsweek

because "I was in the middle of this, and it's not true

that these [aggressive] techniques were effective."

 

Soufan showed Zubaydah photos of al-Qaida members. When

he saw a photo of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the prisoner

identified him as ", the man who had planned and

organized the Sept. 11 attacks. Later the Bush

administration -- with no justification whatsoever --

would celebrate this piece of information from the FBI

interrogation as a significant breakthrough and

evidence of the effectiveness of its new interrogation techniques.

 

A few days later, CIA agents arrived in Thailand. They

had brought along James Mitchell, the architect of the

new interrogation methods. Suddenly the tone changed

dramatically. Mitchell gave orders to intensify

Zubaydah's treatment if he did not respond to questions.

 

One day Soufan, seeing that the prisoner was naked,

threw him a towel. Later on, he and Mitchell argued

heatedly over the prisoner's treatment. "We're the

United States of America, and we don't do that kind of

thing," Soufan recalls shouting at Mitchell. He also

asked Mitchell who had authorized him to use the

aggressive methods. Mitchell responded that he had

received approval from the "highest levels" in

Washington. All this happened in April 2002, four

months before the Bush administration issued its first

torture memorandum to legally justify the interrogation techniques.

 

The FBI finally broke with the CIA on the day Soufan

discovered a wooden box that looked like a coffin. Was

it meant to be used for a mock burial? Soufan called

his superior in Washington. The then FBI Director

Robert Mueller decided that his staff would no longer

take part in these interrogations and ordered Soufan

and the rest of the FBI- team to return to Washington.

Mitchell and the CIA had free rein from then on.

 

Zubaydah later told Red Cross staff that he had been

repeatedly locked into the box, where he had had

difficulty breathing. He said he had also been thrown

against a wall repeatedly, prevented from sleeping,

doused in ice-cold water and subjected to extremely

loud music. He was waterboarded 83 times.

 

"I was told during this period," he said years later,

"that I was one of the first to receive these

interrogation techniques, so no rules applied. It felt

like they were experimenting and trying out techniques

to be used later on other people."

 

Zubaydah was Mitchell's laboratory experiment. The

psychologist allegedly told FBI agents who were present

that Zubaydah had to be kept in a cage like a dog, and

that it was indeed like an experiment. When dogs are

treated with electroshocks, Mitchell said, they too

would give up in the end.

 

For a short time, the interrogations of Abu Zubaydah

were the most well documented of all interrogations.

The CIA once had 92 videotapes of the interrogations,

which included waterboarding. But 90 of the videos were

destroyed in November 2005. This Wednesday, however,

FBI agent Soufan is scheduled to testify before the US

Senate Judiciary Committee.

 

SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, APRIL 2009

 

Business is still going well for Mitchell Jessen &

Associates. The company now has 120 employees, and most

of them have security clearances at levels normally

reserved for government employees. Many former members

of the SERE program now work for the company, which now

occupies two floors of an office building in downtown

Spokane, including the top floor. It is bugproof and

equipped with special, high-security doors -- a

standard the CIA requires from its civilian contractors.

 

Abu Zubaydah's attorney, Brent Mickum, plans to file a

civil suit against Mitchell and Jessen, unless US

President Barack Obama chooses to file criminal charges

against the contractors.

 

When questioned by journalists recently, Mitchell said

that he would be happy to talk about these issues, but

that a confidentiality agreement he had signed prevents

him from doing so.

 

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

 

RELATED SPIEGEL ONLINE LINKS:

 

* Will Germany Take Guantanamo Detainees?: A Worrying Wish List from Washington (05/12/2009)

      http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,624278,00.html

 

* Europe's 'Special Interrogations': New Evidence of Torture Prison in Poland (04/27/2009)

      http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,621450,00.html

 

* The Rendition of Khaled el-Masri: Judgment Day May Be Approaching for CIA

      Agents (05/04/2009) http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,622757,00.html

 

c SPIEGEL ONLINE 2009 All Rights Reserved

_____________________________________________

 

 

No comments: