Published on Portside (https://portside.org/)
The Washington
Post’s Campaign to Keep a Republican in the Maryland Governor’s Office
Pete
Tucker
August
31, 2018
Counterpunch
In 1966 Ann Todd
and Fred Jealous couldn’t get married in their home state of Maryland because
they were an interracial couple. Five decades later their son Ben Jealous is
the Democratic nominee for Maryland governor.
If Jealous wins in
November he will become Maryland’s first African-American governor, and the
nation’s third-ever elected black governor. (Jealous hopes to share this latter
distinction with fellow Democrats Andrew Gillum of Florida and Stacey Abrams of
Georgia, who would also be the first-ever black woman governor.) There are
presently no black governors in office.
Jealous, the
former and youngest-ever head of the NAACP, faces stiff competition, and not
just from incumbent Republican Gov. Larry Hogan. The Washington Post – which
dominates D.C.’s media landscape, including vote-rich Maryland suburbs in
Montgomery and Prince George’s counties – has set its sights on defeating
Jealous.
This may seem
bizarre. Why would the Post throw its weight behind a Republican instead of an
historic candidate like Jealous? Especially when the Post’s aggressive
reporting on President Trump has led to record-breaking readership and heaps of
praise from Democrats.
But the Post’s
resistance to Trump is a mirage, and the paper’s politics remain far from
progressive.
Once Trump isn’t
around, what will be left for the Post to resist? Surely not war, the Post
supports all of them. Not climate change, where the paper’s record is mixed at
best and includes support for both fracking and the Keystone XL pipeline. And
not inequality, as the Post is owned by the richest man alive, Amazon CEO Jeff
Bezos. Like Amazon, the Post is anti-union– that is, against workers
collectively organizing to improve their lot, an essential tool in addressing inequality.
It’s these stances
– along with the Post’s record of targeting candidates with
strong African-American and progressive support – that help
explain the paper’s backing of Hogan and over-the-top opposition to Jealous
(who I am supporting). Still, the extent to which the Post is willing to go to
sway the election is surprising.
‘The Un-Trump
Republican’
The results from
Jealous’s stunning victory in the Democratic primary were barely in when the
Post reported that many Democrats “appeared inclined to back Hogan this fall.”
Maryland has twice
as many registered Democrats as Republicans, so Hogan needs strong Democratic
support to win reelection; and the Post is determined to see that he gets it.
Hogan, the Post
explains, is widely admired for his “winning personality” and “personal
appeal.” He’s just a regular guy who is “real down-to-earth,” “follows his gut”
and “knows his way around a barroom.”
With fawning
coverage like this it’s unsurprising that Hogan is “astonishingly,”
“stunningly” and “hugely” popular, as the Post tells it. (The word “popular” is
used so much one reader asked if the Post had exchanged it for Hogan’s first
name.)
Still, there’s a
possibility of Hogan losing, particularly with Trump so unpopular in deep-blue
Maryland. That’s why the Post tells readers the governor is not only popular
but also “centrist” and “moderate.” He’s “pretty much the opposite of Trump” –
“The Un-Trump Republican.”
Hogan didn’t
support Trump’s candidacy and has distanced himself from a number of the president’s
harsher policies. (He’s even offering $8.5 billion in public goodies to get
Amazon – a company regularly in Trump’s crosshairs – to locate its second
headquarters in Maryland.) But Hogan and Trump actually have quite a bit in
common.
Like Trump, Hogan
has an eponymous real estate company which he refuses to place in a blind trust
but instead placed in a trust run by a family member (his brother Timothy
Hogan). Since Hogan took office in 2015, Hogan Companies – which has done over
$2 billion in deals since its 1985 founding – has entered into many new
contracts and made the governor a tidy $2.4 million, on top of his $180,000
salary, the Baltimore Sun reports. (The Post continues to turn a blind eye
to this arrangement.)
Hogan doesn’t just
have Trump-like business practices, he also shares the president’s approach to
those he disagrees with.
When Maryland’s
teachers union objected to Hogan withholding funds from public schools while
freeing up money for private schools, Hogan called them “thugs.” When Maryland
legislators sought to trim the governor’s powers, Hogan accused them of being
like college kids on spring break. “They come here for a few weeks,” Hogan
said, and “start breaking up the furniture and throwing beer bottles off the
balcony.”
On his official
Facebook page Hogan banned users and deleted their comments if they questioned
his policies, prompting an ACLU lawsuit. Among the 450 banned users were those
calling on Hogan to condemn Trump’s Muslim travel ban (which the governor
declined to do).
Meanwhile Hogan
was quick to go after two teen suspects accused of raping a 14-year-old girl at
a Montgomery County high school. The rape charges against the teens were
dropped, but not before Hogan used their immigration status to help kill a
‘sanctuary city’ bill before the state legislature. (The Post tried to put a
positive spin on this.)
Soon after, Hogan
doubled down, writing in a fundraising letter, “Let me be very clear: we cannot
allow Maryland to become a sanctuary state.” He called on supporters to “help
me push back against a far left agenda and the worst instincts of an
increasingly liberal and out-of-touch State Legislature.”
In addition to
downplaying Hogan’s similarities to Trump, the Post also gives short shrift to
the governor’s policies. And for good reason: they’re unpopular. But the
Post tells readers Marylanders “like him anyway” and “appear willing to
overlook such policy differences.”
What’s behind this
Hogan anomaly, which allows the governor to remain popular despite his disliked
policies?
The Post claims
Hogan is single-handedly pulling this off. He’s so good that he’s somehow
“inoculating himself” from Democratic backlash against Trump. “It’s as if he
has a cloaking device or something,” the Post quotes a Maryland professor as
saying.
But the Hogan
anomaly is actually the predictable result of the Post’s coverage, which buries
his disliked platform under mounds of accolades. What’s not to like about a “a
frustrated Everyman”?
Meanwhile the
Post’s reporting on Jealous has a decidedly different tone.
‘The Coup Leader’
Ben Jealous’s
platform – which includes a $15 an hour minimum wage, single-payer health care
and free state college tuition – is liked by Marylanders. So the Post
downplays these policies (which it opposes), and paints Jealous as a “coup
leader” who is too radical to vote for.
Jealous’s
“left-wing advance” is “irresponsible” and “anything but… centrist,” the Post
tells readers. His “craven,” “reckless” “left-wing platform” will “blow a
Chesapeake Bay-sized hole in the state budget.”
When Jealous
outlined how he will fund his policies, the Post unabashedly steered
voters away from him:
“To pay for it
all, Mr. Jealous would soak the rich — read: Montgomery County — by raising
taxes on the top 1 percent of taxpayers; legalize and tax marijuana; and slash
spending on roads (by building fewer of them) and prisons
(by overhauling the criminal-justice system).”
If you peer
through the Post’s vitriol, what’s left is a popular platform funded in part by
taxing the wealthiest. Instead of conveying this the Post distracts readers by
hyping up how Jealous is creating “upheaval” among Democrats.
Until Jealous’s
“insurgency” the Maryland Democratic Party was one big happy family, according
to the Post. Now there’s “intraparty tension” and “a fissure between the
party’s establishment wing and the restive, left-leaning faction.”
A Post reader took
issue with this “misleading” characterization, calling it a setup to
“rationalize a ‘Democrats for Hogan’ movement” – which certainly appears to be
the Post’s goal.
As another reader
points out, “The ‘Democrats for Hogan’ are mostly older, white men.” But what
these old white guys lack in numbers and diversity they make up for in press
coverage. The Post seems to have a standing offer to Maryland Democrats:
‘Praise Hogan or attack Jealous and we’ll put you in the paper.’
Meanwhile the Post
is eagerly investigating whether Jealous is a socialist. This one shouldn’t
take long to sort out since Jealous has repeatedly said, “I’m a venture
capitalist, not a socialist.” But the Post keeps at it, turning this line of
questioning into a line of attack. Anytime the Post can put “socialist” and
“Jealous” in the same sentence it helps push moderate Democrats into Hogan’s
warm, “bipartisan” embrace.
When it comes to
Jealous’s secret socialism the Post and Hogan are on the same page. The
Republican Governors Association – where Hogan serves as vice-chairman – has
already spent over $1.4 million on TV ads attacking Jealous, including one ad
that quotes him as saying, “Go ahead, call me a socialist,” but leaves off the
second part of his statement: “That doesn’t change the fact I’m a venture
capitalist.”
At an August press
conference a Post reporter followed up on the Republicans’ false ad by again
asking Jealous if he was a socialist. Jealous responded: “[Hogan] calling me a
far-left socialist is what the Tea Party called President Obama. It’s what
Barry Goldwater called Martin Luther King.”
More recently it’s
what Ron DeSantis, the Republican nominee for Florida governor, called his
African-American opponent Andrew Gillum. DeSantis’s statement – “The last thing
we need to do is monkey this up by trying to embrace a socialist agenda.” –
drew attention for its use of a racial slur. But notably he was also echoing
Hogan’s and the Post’s charge against Jealous: that he’s a socialist.
The morning after
the Florida primary Trump also weighed in, calling Gillum “a failed Socialist
Mayor.”
Back at Jealous’s
press conference, having addressed the socialism accusation for the umpteenth
time, the candidate was ready to move on. But the Post was not, and their
reporter’s persistence paid off when an exasperated Jealous finally responded,
“Are you fucking kidding me?”
And now Post
readers can expect “f-bomb” references sprinkled throughout stories on Jealous
from here till election day.
The Post’s Targets
The scary part is
that it’s only August and Jealous is well behind in the polls. As the race
tightens in the fall the Post is likely to go even harder at Jealous, as it has
done to past targets – most recently in the Montgomery County executive’s race.
Despite the Post’s
repeated attacks in the closing weeks of the election, Montgomery County
Councilman Marc Elrich, a democratic socialist with strong union backing, eked
out a win in the Democratic primary. Elrich’s victory so unnerved the Post that
its headline didn’t name him but instead talked up how “Business leaders back
possible independent bid” against him.
In 2016 another
progressive candidate, then-Maryland Congresswoman Donna Edwards, sought to
become just the second black woman to serve in the Senate (a distinction since
earned by Kamala Harris). Despite strong black support, the Post thwarted her
bid, telling voters she was a “Democratic facsimile of Sen. Ted Cruz” who was
“pandering to black voters.”
In 2014 the Post
targeted another official backed by black voters, then-D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray.
Gray led in all polls until the week before early voting, when the Post’s
coverage went from partisan to insane, with a banner front page headline
declaring him guilty of a crime for which he would never be
charged, dooming his reelection bid.
One of Gray’s
backers was Bruce Bereano, a lobbyist who is now supporting Hogan. It’s worth
examining how the Post handles this tricky situation. With Gray, the Post
qualified the support by noting Bereano’s past “troubles with federal
authorities.” (Bereano served a 10-month sentence for mail fraud.) With Hogan,
Bereano is described as a Democratic lobbyist, who loves the
governor.
The Post doesn’t
just omit Bereano’s past, it also hides a more crucial fact: Hogan named
Bereano’s son to the bench.
With the Post’s
omissions, the story is about another Democrat supporting Hogan, and not how
the governor and a lobbyist with a questionable background are involved in a
possible pay-to-play arrangement.
Rest assured, if
Bereano switches his support to Jealous the Post will rediscover his past – as
it did when he backed Gray.
A single instance
of this type of biased coverage can have an impact. But when it’s part of a
coordinated effort, like the one the Post is undertaking against Jealous, it
can swing an election.
Pete Tucker is a
journalist based in DC. He can be reached at his website.
Source URL: https://portside.org/2018-09-05/washington-posts-campaign-keep-republican-maryland-governors-office
Donations can be sent
to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD
21218. Ph: 410-323-1607; Email: mobuszewski2001 [at] comcast.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/
"The master class
has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.
The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject
class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their
lives." Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment