Wednesday, February 08,
2017
Dear
So-Called President Trump: Where’s My Protest Paycheck?
Dear So-Called President Trump:
I was among the roughly five million Americans who took to the
streets in cities across the country a few weeks ago in opposition to your
outrageous policies regarding women, Muslims, school children, immigrants,
workers, the environment, and people who need health care. (That’s me in the
photo above with my 20-year old daughter Sarah). I left my home around 7 am,
took the subway from Pasadena to downtown Los Angeles, and participated in the
demonstration — marching, holding signs, shouting chants, listening to speakers
and musicians — until about 4 pm. I got back on the subway and returned to my
house around 5 pm. In other words, I spent about 10 hours involved in the
protest.
That was the largest one-day protest in American history. A
majority of the five million participants (750,000 in LA alone) were protesting
for the first time. I didn’t really understand what brought them out to protest
on a sunny Saturday when they could have been doing so many other things. But
your recent Tweet explained why.
Last week you Tweeted that “Professional anarchists, thugs and
paid protesters are proving the point of the millions of people who voted to
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
Thank you for the reminder. I forgot to pick up my paycheck for
protesting. Whomever is paying people to protest left me off the list — or just
ripped me off. Since the federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour, I am owed at
least $72.50 for the 10 hours I spent protesting that Saturday. However as of
this January 1 the California minimum wage is now $10.50 an hour, so I’m
actually owed $105, and even more if the people who are paying people to
protest against you abide by overtime rules.
If all five million Americans who protested that day got paid
the federal minimum wage, and if people spent an average of five hours
protesting, those patriotic rabble-rousers are owed a total of at least $181
million in unpaid protest wages.
I think you’ll agree that putting $181 million in Americans’
pockets is good for the economy. If you will recall the Economics 101 course
you probably took at college, that is called an increase in “consumer demand.”
Economists also call it the “multiplier effect.” The five million protesters
will spend that $181 million in their local economies — boosting sales,
revenues, and jobs. So thank you for reminding us that protest is good for the
economy.
You will be pleased to know that Americans will continue to
protest your policies for the next four years. Not all the protests will be as
large as the January 21 women’s march, but the number of Americans who feel
compelled to protest against you will certainly grow as you pursue reckless,
dangerous and inhumane policies. Every week, in cities, suburbs and small towns
across America, people will be in the streets, at town meetings, on college
campuses, at their workplaces, at airports, in churches and synagogues, and
elsewhere raising their voices in opposition to almost everything you are
trying to do.
Let’s take a conservative estimate that every week, on average,
100,000 Americans engage in some kind of local protest over the next four
years. Let’s assume that each person spends an average of three hours
participating in protest and earns the current federal minimum wage of $7.25 an
hour. That adds up to $452 million during your four years as president —
assuming you are not impeached.
Of course, you won’t be surprised that in addition to all those
local protests, at least four times a year, Americans will mount the kind of
major nationwide protests that we saw a few weeks ago, with five million people
taking to the streets. So let’s add another $181 million for each protest —
four times a year, for four years. This will increase the protest payroll by
another $2.9 billion. Altogether, that’s $3.42 billion in protest paychecks
over four years. I haven’t even factored in the higher minimum wage levels in
many states and cities.
You are already doing your part by adopting policies and making
statements that make Americans so angry that they are joining protests in
record numbers. But if you’d really like to do something to improve the economy
even more, you could raise the federal minimum to $15 an hour. That would
quickly and dramatically increase America’s protest payroll and be a real boost
the economy.
I realize that it is selfish of me to bring this up, but what
about all the back pay I’m owed for the protests I’ve participated in since the
1960s? I’ve been to hundreds of protests for civil rights, against the Vietnam
war, for women’s rights and against apartheid, for more funding for public
schools, against the U.S. overthrow of Chile’s president Salvador Allende and
against U.S. aid to the Nicaraguan contras, against police killing of unarmed
Black Americans, in favor of workers’ rights, and against government bail-outs
to Wall Street banks.
As you can see in the above photographs, I brought my twin
daughters Amelia and Sarah to a protest in Los Angeles in 2002 against the U.S.
invasion of Iraq and I joined with my wife Terry, our dog Mia, and our friends
last year at a huge march of workers and supporters demanding a $15 minimum
wage in my hometown of Pasadena. (You’ll be please know that we won that
fight). On a rainy night two weeks ago I joined about 150 people at a protest in
front of the $26 million Los Angeles mansion owned by Steve Mnuchin,
the Wall Street predator (known as the “foreclosure king”) who was your
campaign finance
chair and whom you’ve nominated to be Secretary of the
Treasury. (That’s me, with the gray hair, behind the sign).
Shouldn’t the hundreds of millions of Americans who, over the
years, sat in at lunch counters, participated in strikes, carried picket signs
for reproductive rights and same-sex marriage, rallied against nuclear weapons,
and shouted “no justice, no peace” and “end racism” get paid for their protest
activism? Rep. John Lewis,
who put his body on the line hundreds of times for social justice — and whom
you described as “all talk, no action” in a twitter tantrum last month — would
be owed a fortune in back protest pay.
Do you think we could find a “so-called” judge who would be
sympathetic to this wage-theft cause and order the owners of Protest Inc. to
compensate us for our labor?
I don’t consider this reparations for radicals and reformers. I
see it as the kind of economic nationalism you’ve been talking about. You can’t
export protest jobs. These are Americans jobs for Americans. As any economist
could tell you, those back payments would do wonders for the economy.
Just as George W. Bush was known as the “war president,” and
Barack Obama was known (at least by Republicans) as the “food stamp president,”
you will surely go down in history as the “protest president.” You’ve done more
than any other U.S. president to unite Americans and galvanize them into an
oppositional protest movement. You’ve called us “paid protesters.” Once we all
get paid, we will feel proud to have helped make America great again.
This work
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
Peter Dreier is
E.P. Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics, and chair of the Urban &
Environmental Policy Department, at Occidental College. His most recent book
is The 100 Greatest
Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame (Nation
Books, 2012). His other books include: Place Matters:
Metropolitics for the 21st Century (University Press of
Kansas, 3rd edition, 2014), and The Next Los Angeles:
The Struggle for a Livable City (University of California
Press, revised 2006). He writes regularly for the Los Angeles Times, Common
Dreams, The Nation, and Huffington Post.
Donations can be sent
to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD
21218. Ph: 410-323-1607; Email: mobuszewski [at] verizon.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/
"The master class
has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.
The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject
class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their
lives." Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment