Friends,
"It's disappointing that President Biden would propose a
budget of $715 billion for the Pentagon."
Rep. Ro
Khanna (D-Calif.) is seen on the House steps of the Capitol during votes on
Friday, December 4, 2020. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty
Images)
Congressman
Ro Khanna of California was the first House
Democrat to speak out Friday against President Joe Biden's request for a $715
billion Pentagon budget for Fiscal Year 2022, an increase from the current $704
billion level approved under former President Donald Trump.
"At a
time when his own Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, recently criticized a
federal budget that is basically 'military and pensions' without building our
productivity capability here at home, it's disappointing that President Biden
would propose a budget of $715 billion for the Pentagon, an increase of 1.6%
over Trump's $704 billion budget, instead of working toward returning to the
Obama-Biden era spending levels," Khanna said in a statement.
While
applauding Biden's proposed elimination of the overseas contingency operations
(OCO) account—an off-budget war
funding pool that critics have decried as a "slush
fund"—Khanna said he is "concerned that this budget will likely
include other wasteful spending," such as money for new intercontinental
ballistic missiles pushed by the powerful weapons
lobby.
"We
need a fundamental shift in how we address national security issues and invest
in climate action and pandemic response," said Khanna, the deputy whip of
the Congressional Progressive Caucus. "Those are the issues impacting the
security of the American people and will keep Americans safer than spending
billions on more deadly weapons."
In total,
Biden's FY2022 budget outline calls
for $753 billion in overall military spending—including $715 billion for the
Pentagon—and $769 billion for non-defense [sic] federal departments.
The Biden
administration's document does not detail where it wants to send the $38
billion in military spending not earmarked for the Pentagon, but Defense
[sic] News reported that
"a large chunk of that is traditionally tied up in the National Nuclear
Security Administration, a semiautonomous agency within the Energy Department
that handles nuclear warheads."
On Friday
afternoon, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) joined Khanna in criticizing the
president's first budget proposal, which came after progressive lawmakers and
advocacy groups urged Biden
to push for substantial cuts to out-of-control Pentagon spending.
"A
proposed increase of $13 billion in defense [sic] spending is far too
much," Pocan said in a statement.
"We cannot build back better if the Pentagon's budget is larger than it
was under Donald Trump."
"We
recognize that non-defense [sic] spending has a proposed 16% increase, versus
the 1.7% increase in defense [sic] spending," the Wisconsin Democrat
added. "But increased spending on the Pentagon on fraud, waste, and zero
accountability is still just that, and takes away from funding that could be
spent on other people-centric policies like healthcare, education, and
housing."
Our work is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel
free to republish and share widely.
Donations can be sent
to Max Obuszewski, Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 431 Notre Dame Lane, Apt. 206,
Baltimore, MD 21212. Ph: 410-323-1607; Email: mobuszewski2001 [at]
comcast.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/
"The master class
has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.
The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject
class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their
lives." Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment