Friends,
Prevent Nuclear War Maryland
is considering organizing a demonstration at Lockheed Martin headquarters in
Bethesda, Maryland on Labor Day. Let me know if you are able to join us
to speak out against the awful Saudi-UAE-USA attack on the people of Yemen,
including the children. We must end the carnage.
Kagiso,
Max
US Bombs
Are Killing Children in Yemen. Does Anybody Care?
The lack of outrage at the US’s key role in this humanitarian
disaster raises troubling questions
By Moustafa Bayoumi
August 26, 2018
This
is not a column about Donald Trump. It’s also not about Paul Manafort, Michael
Cohen or Robert Mueller, and it’s certainly not about Rudolph Giuliani and his
way with words. On the contrary, this is a column about the things we are not
paying attention to, and why we should.
On 9
August, the US-backed Saudi-led coalition waging war in Yemen against
a Houthi-led rebellion dropped a bomb on a school bus packed with children.
According to reports, the excited kids had been on a school trip marking the
end of their summer classes, and as they passed a busy marketplace, the bomb
directly hit their vehicle.
The
results were horrific. Of the 54 people killed, 44 were children, with most
between the ages of six and 11. The pictures of the dead
and injured children, some of whom can be seen wearing their blue Unicef
backpacks, are beyond heartbreaking.
And
the tragedy in Yemen is unrelenting. Just this past Thursday, a mere two weeks
after the school bus attack, Saudi-led coalition airstrikes killed yet another 26 children and four
women fleeing the fighting in the western province of Hudaydah.
If
this sounds to you like I’m relating a story about how terrible the civil war
in Yemen is, then you’d be correct, although – and let’s be honest here – the
war in Yemen occupies almost none of our collective political attention today.
Could it be that we don’t care all that much about this war because Yemenis are
Muslim, brown, and poor, and we’ve already been droning them for years on end?
The
reality is that the war has created the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophe
today. Three-quarters of the population, some 22 million Yemenis, require
humanitarian assistance and protection. About 8.4 million people hang on the
brink of starvation and another 7 million lie malnourished. Since 2015, more
than 28,000 thousand people have been killed or injured, and many thousands
more have died from causes exacerbated by war, such as a cholera epidemic that
has afflicted more than a million people and
claimed over 2,300 lives. At least one child dies every 10 minutes from causes
linked to the war, according to the United Nations.
But
this is also a story about the responsibility of the United States. A report
by CNN indicates that the bomb used in the
school bus airstrike was a 500-pound laser-guided MK 82 bomb, manufactured by
Lockheed Martin, one of the largest US defense contractors. Having facilitated
the sale to the Saudi-led coalition of the weapon used to kill these children,
does the United States bear any responsibility for their deaths?
Undoubtedly.
For one thing, these latest bombings are hardly the only times the Saudi-led
coalition has killed civilians from the air. An independent monitoring group,
the Yemen Data Project, found that there have been 55 airstrikes
against civilian vehicles and buses in the first seven months of this year
alone, and that of the 18,000 airstrikes between March 2015 to April 2018,
almost a third (31%) of the targets were non-military (either civilians or
civilian infrastructure) and another 33% of the strikes were classified as
having unknown targets.
That’s 64% of the strikes that could not be determined
as having clear military targets.
And then
there’s existing law. In a 2017 report, the American Bar Association concluded
that “in the context of multiple credible reports of recurring and highly
questionable strikes … further sales [of arms] under both the Arms Export
Control Act and the Foreign Assistance Act are prohibited until the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia takes effective measures to ensure compliance with international
law and the President submits relevant certifications to the Congress”.
The
United States is certainly aware of how poorly the coalition is prosecuting the
war. How can it not be? The US provides aerial targeting assistance to
the coalition, for Pete’s sake, along with intelligence sharing and mid-flight
aerial refueling for coalition aircraft. And of course, the US supplies (with
the UK) the bulk of the coalition’s weapons. Lots of them. Hundreds of billions
of dollars’ worth.
This
failed strategy was begun under the Obama administration, not under Trump. But
when coalition fighter jets bombed a funeral hall and killed over 140 people in
October 2016, the Obama administration began mulling their options. In his last
weeks in office, Obama finally restricted sales of precision-guided
munitions to Saudi Arabia amid concerns over civilian casualties, but by May
2017, sales resumed when the secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, overturned the
ban. Obama was no peace-monger president, however. His administration oversaw
the sales of more weapons than any other president
since 1945, and most of the arms sold during his time in office went to Saudi
Arabia.
Opposition
to the US’s blank-check policy regarding this war has been growing not only
among lawyers but also among lawmakers. Earlier this year, Senators Bernie
Sanders, Mike Lee and Chris Murphy introduced a joint resolution in the Senate to end US
support for the coalition, though it was effectively defeated in March by a
vote of 55-44. (John McCain did not vote.)
On 22
August, Murphy also introduced an amendment to the defense appropriations bill
that would have cut off funds for the coalition until the secretary of defense
could certify that rules for the protection of civilians were being properly
followed. His efforts were blocked by the Republican senator Richard
Shelby, whose donors, perhaps not coincidentally, are Boeing (also a major
defense contractor) and Lockheed Martin.
With
Trump, the situation is as you would expect. It is his administration after all
that bans Yemenis from coming to the United States. The massive $717bn National
Defense Authorization Act, recently signed into law by the president, does
contain specific limited language designed to minimize civilian deaths in
Yemen. The president, however, has issued a signing statement. He won’t abide by these provisions
of the law. Unsurprisingly, his justification is that he has “exclusive
constitutional authorities as commander in chief and as the sole representative
of the nation in foreign affairs”.
Trump’s
indifference to the suffering in Yemen is to be expected, But what about ours?
Do the American people not realize that our bombs are killing innocent children
in Yemen or do we just not care? The lack of public outrage – or even just
attention – to what the US-backed Saudi-led coalition is doing with American
support and American-made munitions indicates something disturbing. Despite
the evidence that we have become more
politically engaged since the 2016 election, we still have little to no
interest in what is done in our name overseas.
There
could be another, related explanation, as well. The circus show that is the
Trump administration has, like a fireball in an air shaft, swallowed all the
oxygen in the room. The administration’s endless scandals give us just the
justification we need to focus almost exclusively on our domestic life and not
on America’s meddling in rest of the world.
But if
that’s the case, this is a dangerous state of affairs. A lot of bad things can
happen when people aren’t looking. And our lack of attention to anything but
our president or ourselves says a lot, not only about Donald Trump, but about
us, too.
© 2018
The Guardian
Believing
a better world is possible and organizing to achieve it, that is our shared
duty. Even as many news outlets are shedding staff or closing doors, our plans
are just the opposite. We're growing. We're gearing up. After more than
20 years of fighting for the common good, we're just getting started. But
we can't do it alone. We need you. Together we can make a difference. And
now—at this crucial moment in history—we need your support and financial backing
more than ever. Can you pitch in
today?
Moustafa Bayoumi is the author of the award-winning books How Does It Feel
To Be a Problem?: Being Young and Arab in America and This Muslim American
Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror. He is
Professor of English at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Donations can be sent
to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD
21218. Ph: 410-323-1607; Email: mobuszewski2001 [at] comcast.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/
"The master class
has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.
The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject
class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their
lives." Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment