Published on Portside (https://portside.org)
With the
Trump Travel Ban, Americans Face an Important Choice
November 30, 2017
Azadeh Shahshahani
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Atlanta Magazine
On October
16th, a day before the third iteration of the Trump administration’s travel ban
for Muslim-majority countries was scheduled to go into effect, federal district
courts in Hawaii and Maryland blocked it, seeing it for what it was—an
unconstitutional and abhorrent policy. The Hawaii court’s nationwide injunction
blocked this particular ban from going forward for all nationals
of the countries targeted—Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, and Chad. On
November 13, however, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco
allowed part of the ban to go into effect by narrowing the Hawaii court’s
injunction [1]. The 9th Circuit did so by only
allowing nationals of the six Muslim-majority countries to enter if they have a
“bona fide relationship with a person or entity [2]”—a family
member or university, for example.
Americans
now face a choice: Do we stand up for our highest values, treating others with
dignity, fairness, and respect? Or do we succumb to bigotry and fear, allowing
ourselves to be divided on the basis of faith or nation of origin?
As an
Iranian-American, this hits close to home. My husband, Maysam, came to this
country from Iran in January 2000 through a student visa to get his PhD in
electrical engineering at the University of Michigan. At the time, he had no
family relationships with anyone in the United States.
Eighteen
years later, he is a professor at Georgia Tech. His research focuses on helping
people with disabilities lead independent lives. One of Maysam’s inventions,
the Tongue Drive System [3], aims
to enable [4] individuals with
severe paralysis to operate their own wheelchairs or use a computer [5], all by
moving their tongue. Had the Muslim ban been in effect at the time he was
contemplating continuing his education, the opportunity to come to the U.S. and
work on this innovative research may not have been available to him. (Though
the newest version of the ban carves out an exception for Iranians seeking
student visas, they would be subject to “enhanced screening and vetting
requirements;” who can say what that would mean under this administration?)
Those with serious illnesses and disabilities who rely on his research to ease
their pain and improve their lives may have been deprived of the fruits of his
work.
My in-laws
went through a rigorous process back in 2001—even before the September 11
attacks—to secure visas so they could attend our wedding. If a Muslim ban is
ultimately implemented, as President Trump is trying to do, untold numbers of
family members from Muslim countries will be denied the chance to see their
American children, grandchildren, siblings, nieces, and nephews get married or
graduate college.
Trump’s
proposal united our communities in opposition. Earlier this year in Atlanta,
with less than a day’s notice, 7,000 people showed up to protest [6] at the airport. Most
of the protesters were not even directly impacted by the ban, but they rightly
saw the policy as a threat against all of us.
I found
this show of support and solidarity heart-warming and affirming; one of our
country’s strongest moments since Trump’s inauguration. This felt like a “bona
fide relationship” in the truest sense—neighbors standing up for neighbors
because of our common ideals.
Despite the
court rulings in our favor, Muslim travelers remain confused and intimidated.
Rules for travel are changing all the time, and many travelers are still being
stopped at the border due to racial profiling or arbitrary bureaucratic snafus.
The rhetoric that led to the ban trickles down into administrative measures
ranging from race-based TSA searches of travelers to arbitrary visa denials for
those trying to enter the United States.
Banning
researchers and grandmas makes us no safer. Instead it damages our families,
communities, and academic institutions. The Supreme Court must strike down this
reprehensible ban once and for all, agreeing with the lower courts that such a
ban amounts to nothing more than religious intolerance and racial animus.
As
Americans, we must continue to raise our voices and resoundingly reject any
version of the Muslim ban. See you in the streets.
Azadeh
Shahshahani is the legal and advocacy director with Project
South [7], a social justice organization
based in Atlanta, and a past president of the National Lawyers Guild. She
tweets at @ashahshahani [8].
Thanks to
the author for sending this to Portside.
Links:
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-ruling/appeals-court-lets-trump-travel-ban-go-partially-into-effect-idUSKBN1DD272
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-appeals-court-allows-trumps-third-travel-ban-partially-to-take-effect/2017/11/13/c3c15cf4-c89a-11e7-aa96-54417592cf72_story.html?utm_term=.2e6403a83ad4
[3] http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/01/25/hm.wheelchair.tongue/index.html
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s8IsRrzv-g
[5] http://www.atlantamagazine.com/health/thanks-to-georgia-tech-a-tongue-piercing-could-soon-control-a-wheelchair/
[6] http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/06/us/attorneys-activists-fighting-travel-ban/index.html
[7] https://projectsouth.org/
[8] http://twitter.com/ashahshahani
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-appeals-court-allows-trumps-third-travel-ban-partially-to-take-effect/2017/11/13/c3c15cf4-c89a-11e7-aa96-54417592cf72_story.html?utm_term=.2e6403a83ad4
[3] http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/01/25/hm.wheelchair.tongue/index.html
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s8IsRrzv-g
[5] http://www.atlantamagazine.com/health/thanks-to-georgia-tech-a-tongue-piercing-could-soon-control-a-wheelchair/
[6] http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/06/us/attorneys-activists-fighting-travel-ban/index.html
[7] https://projectsouth.org/
[8] http://twitter.com/ashahshahani
Donations can be sent
to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD
21218. Ph: 410-323-1607; Email: mobuszewski2001 [at] comcast.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/
"The master class
has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.
The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject
class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their
lives." Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment