Thursday, July 02, 2015
The Torture of Absolute Power
Detainees sitting in a holding area watched by military police
at Camp X-Ray inside Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (Photo: REUTERS)
“The existence of the approximately 14,000 photographs will
probably cause yet another delay in the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, as attorneys for the defendants demand that all the images be turned over
and the government wades through the material to decide what it thinks is
relevant to the proceedings.”
This was the Washington Post a few days ago, informing
us wearily that the torture thing isn’t dead yet. The bureaucracy convulses,
the wheels of justice grind. So much moral relativism to evaluate.
“They did what they were asked to do in the service of our
nation,” CIA director John Brennan said at a news conference in December,
defending CIA interrogators after a portion of the 6,700-page Senate
Intelligence Committee report was made public.
Serving the nation means no more than doing what you’re told.
God bless America. Flags wave, fireworks burst on the horizon.
Aren’t we terrific? But this idea we celebrate — this nation, this principled
union of humanity — is just a military bureaucracy, full of dark secrets. The
darkest, most highly classified secret of all is that we’re always at war and
we always will be. And war is an end in itself. It has no purpose beyond its own
perpetuation.
This is the context of torture.
At least this is what occurred to me as I reflected on the most
recent non-news, that the existence of multi-thousands of photographs of U.S.
black site operations are out there somewhere, classified but known and
pulsing. What more can we learn that we don’t already know?
“On Nov. 20, 2002, (Gul) Rahman was found dead in his unheated
cell. He was naked from the waist down and had been chained to a concrete
floor. An autopsy concluded that he probably froze to death.”
So the Los Angeles Times informed
us in December, in an article about two psychologists, Bruce Jessen and James
Mitchell, who were serving their country in the early days of the War on Terror
by developing the CIA’s torture methodology.
“When he was left alone,” the article reported, describing
another detainee’s experience, “(Abu) Zubaydah ‘was placed in a stress
position, left on a waterboard with a cloth over his face, or locked in one of
two confinement boxes.’
“In all, he spent 266 hours — 11 days and two hours — locked in
the pitch-dark coffin, and 29 hours in a much smaller box. In response, he
‘cried,’ ‘begged,’ ‘whimpered’ and grew so distressed that ‘he was unable to
effectively communicate,’ the interrogation team reported.
“The escalating torment, especially the waterboarding, affected
some on the CIA team. ‘It is visually and psychologically very uncomfortable,’
one wrote. Several days later, another added, ‘Several on the team profoundly
affected . . . some to the point of tears and choking up.’”
And a few weeks ago, The Telegraph newspaper,
quoting from the Senate Intelligence Committee Report, described the
experience of Majid Khan, who “was raped while in CIA custody (‘rectal
feeding’). He was sexually assaulted in other ways as well, including by having
his ‘private parts’ touched while he was hung naked from the ceiling. . . .
“‘Majid had an uncovered bucket for a toilet, no toilet paper, a
sleeping mat and no light. . . . For much of 2003 he lived in total darkness.’”
And the awkward part of all this, for defenders of the military
bureaucracy, is that these torture procedures produced no information of any
value. We sold our soul to the devil and got nothing at all in return. Bad
deal.
Whatever details about the torture program remain classified and
buried, these stories, along with plenty of shocking photographs, are fully
public. There’s enough data here to open a deep conversation about what it
means to be a nation and what the limits of power ought to be. What I see
instead is a sort of official resignation — on the part of media and government
— to the inevitability of out-of-control power in the pursuit of self-defense.
Philip Zimbardo called this phenomenon the Lucifer Effect: the
utterly corrupting nature of total power over others. Reports of CIA torture
are rife with observations that the interrogators were out of control. The
information they sought from the utterly powerless detainees in their keep was
a treasure to be extracted, like oil or diamonds from the bowels of the earth,
and no technique was too inhumane, too morally odious, to achieve that end.
Call it human fracking. It’s for the good of America.
The awareness that must emerge from a decade-and-counting of
torture revelations is that absolute power over others does not keep us safe
and should not be pursued. And torture is only a minute fraction of the wrong
we promulgate through unchecked militarism, the aim of which is domination of
the planet.
Step one in the unhealthy pursuit of power is the dehumanization
of “the enemy.” The consequences of what we do after that will always haunt us.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share
Alike 3.0 License
Donations can be sent
to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD
21218. Ph: 410-366-1637; Email: mobuszewski [at] verizon.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/
"The master class
has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.
The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject
class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their
lives." Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment