5 Reasons the Obscene National Security Budget Is Larger Than It Appears

Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org)

Waging Nonviolence [1] / By Eric Stoner [2]

5 Reasons the Obscene National Security Budget Is Larger Than It Appears

March 6, 2014 |

When President Obama released his budget [3] for 2015 on Tuesday, which included $495.6 billion for the Pentagon, the likely suspects screamed [4] that the sky is going to fall. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Buck McKeon said the funding level is so low that it’s “immoral,” while the notorious climate denier Sen. James Inhofe — who is a ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee — declared that: “Today our enemies don’t fear us and our allies no longer respect us.” Strong words. Also, completely disconnected from reality.

Not only does this budget allocate a mere $420 million less [5] than the Defense Department received from Congress this year, it represents just a fraction of the actual amount that will go towards maintaining the massive U.S. security apparatus. To get a more accurate picture of the true cost of the American empire, various programs and line items that do not fall under the Pentagon’s base budget must be included in this tally.

1) War spending: Despite the fact that Obama still officially plans to end combat operations in Afghanistan by the end of the year, the budget includes [6] $79.4 billion for the war in 2015. Granted, that is only a placeholder. The actual figure will be decided on later, but it does give a sense of what is to be expected, which is essentially a continuation of the tragic status quo.

2) Veterans: To take account of the total price tag of the many wars that the United States has fought — and continues to fight — the long-term cost of providing for veterans should be included. To meet these needs, $68.4 billion has been requested for the Department of Veterans Affairs.

3) Intelligence: With the CIA responsible [7] for hundreds of drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, and the NSA secretly assisting the military with its assassination program around the world — as was recently exposed [8] — it seems only right to include the proposed budget of $45.6 billion for the National Intelligence Program in this calculation.

4) Homeland Security: In any honest account of our actual “defense” spending, the $38.2 billion requested for the Department of Homeland Security should naturally be factored in, since it includes funding for cybersecurity, the TSA and border patrol.

5) Nuclear weapons: The proposed $8.3 billion associated with maintaining a “safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent,” as well as the ensuing $5.6 billion required for disposing of nuclear waste fall under the Department of Energy’s budget.
This is by no means a complete accounting of security-related costs that are hidden in other parts of the budget — such as military aid to foreign countries — but when these most obvious expenses are added up, the price tag jumps to $741 billion. To get a better sense of how staggering that figure is, it breaks down to more than $23,000 per second, every second of the year.

It also represents 73 percent of the trillion dollar discretionary budget, which includes spending for education, transportation, housing, food and the environment. That means that — if this budget is approved — at least 73 cents of every dollar that Congress will decide how to spend next year, will go to propping up the most expensive military machine on the planet, instead of taking care of the millions of Americans who struggle every day to meet their basic necessities. Now that is what I call immoral.

Source URL: http://www.alternet.org/world/5-reasons-obscene-national-security-budget-larger-it-appears-0

Links:
[1] http://wagingnonviolence.org/
[2] http://www.alternet.org/authors/eric-stoner
[3] http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2015/assets/budget.pdf
[4] http://www.defensenews.com/article/20140304/DEFREG02/303040031/GOP-Hawks-Blast-Obama-Budget-26B-Wish-List-Could-Doomed
[5] http://complex.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/03/04/pentagon_chooses_machinery_over_manpower_in_budget_battle
[6] http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/budget-appropriations/199870-group-slams-pentagon-request-for-more-wartime-funds#ixzz2v2l5yFuF
[7] http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/category/projects/drones/
[8] https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014/02/10/the-nsas-secret-role/

Donations can be sent to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD 21218. Ph: 410-366-1637; Email: mobuszewski [at] verizon.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/

"The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs