http://michiganpeacenetwork.org/petitions/action.php?id=100&uid=9251
Anabel Dwyer <anabeldwyer@yahoo.com>
Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:38 AM
We have 275 signatures on the petition, 225 to go to reach our goal of 500. Please keep up the request for signatures. Full text below....
To sign letter go to:
http://michiganpeacenetwork.org/petitions/Immediate-and-Unconditional-Release-of-Y12-Resisters
Anabel
----
An Open letter to:
The Honorable H. Bruce Guyton
US District Court
In Re: Immediate and unconditional release of all defendants is required to pursue good-faith discussion and implementation of essential non-violent nuclear disarmament and to avoid further cruel and unnecessary punishment.
v.
Jean T. Gump, Elizabeth Ann Lentsch, Bradford J. Lyttle, William Jerome Bichsel, David L. Corcoran, Bonnie L. Urfer, Carol Sue Gilbert, Ardeth Platte, Jacqueline Marie Hudson (deceased 8/3/11), Paula Rosdatter, Michael Walli, Steve J. Baggarly and Dennis DuVall
(defendants)
No. 3:10-CR-94
Dear Judge Guyton:
We the undersigned urge you to release immediately and unconditionally all the above defendants on your own initiative.
The further punishment or imprisonment of these defendants not only further endangers their lives and health but also undermines the integrity of the
We concur with and point out the defendants’ accurate understanding of the facts and law as summarized below. These show no need for sentencing according to the standards set forth in 18 USC 3553 (a) (1) & (2).
As citizens and lawyers of the United States we are working to fulfill our “obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control" (International Court of Justice (ICJ) Opinion, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Reports, 8 July 1996, ss 105(2)F; Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Art. VI).
1. These defendants simply and sensibly endeavored to create a real dialogue about and take non-violent steps toward obligatory nuclear disarmament.
On July 5, 2010 these defendants went under three strands of barbed wire at the Y-12 Oak Ridge nuclear weapons site to read a Declaration of Nuclear Independence (c.f. Nuclear Resister Report from July 2010).
That declaration in part read: “Under principles of democracy we exercise the right of every citizen of this republic and this planet to peacefully resist the nuclear threat, attacking as it does every core concept of human rights.”
These defendants acted on the specific knowledge that the
Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) through Babcock and Wilcox, Technical Services LLC continue to refurbish or “extend the lives” of 100 kiloton nuclear warheads at the Y-12 site in
In addition, each 100 kiloton nuclear warhead produced or refurbished at Y-12 is known and intended to precipitate or inflict uncontrollable and indiscriminate heat, blast and radiation. The radiation causes immediately lethal and long-term carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects on human beings and other life forms. Because these effects cannot be controlled in space or time, nuclear weapons categorically including this nuclear weapon, violate the fundamental rules and principles of humanitarian law, the laws of war, and the
In short the rule of law and nuclear weapons cannot coexist. It is ultra vires in the extreme for any government or corporation to threaten or use the most egregious of weapons of mass destruction, nuclear weapons. To say as these defendants have that it is also unlawful to plan, prepare or refurbish 100 kiloton W-76 nuclear warheads since they are for the fundamentally unlawful purposes of threat or use should not be a surprise.
Instead of taking up a genuine discussion on the crucial steps for nuclear disarmament, the
We understand that this Court prohibited at trial any defense evidence of the lethality and unlawfulness of the nuclear weapons refurbished at Y-12 in
We are also shocked that
regarding nuclear weapons is considered a non-justiciable political question and that trespass charges can be brought and litigated at a nuclear weapons production or deployment site without reference to well understood peremptory limits to the use of force. But if the
2. The punishments already endured by these defendants are already far out of proportion to the measured steps they took to address these most important questions.
Sr. Jacqueline Marie Hudson, who with others of these defendants worked for 30 years toward non-violent nuclear disarmament, died August 3, 2011. Her illness was at least greatly exacerbated by the abusive and negligent delay of proper evaluation and treatment (from May 27-June 10) by the Irwin County Detention Center (ICDC) a US Bureau of Prison private (for profit) detention facility. Six more of the defendants remain held in ICDC before their September sentencing dates. There are several other examples of cruel and negligent treatment of these defendants by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and by the ICDC, whose inhumane procedures and conditions were known or should have been known by the court, the prosecutors and the BOP (cf. e.g. March 28, 2011 “Submission re: Racial Profiling in Gwinnett and Cobb Counties, Georgia and Conditions of Detention at Stewart and Irwin County Detention Centers” to The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights from the ACLU of Georgia, National Security /Immigrants’
Rights Project.)
Jean Gump and Bill Bichsel, in spite of their ages, health and status also as very distinguished non-violent resisters to US nuclear weapons remain under draconian pre-trial and pre-sentence conditions. David Corcoran’s trial has been further continued due to illness.
All of these defendants have been subjected to pre-trial and pre-sentencing punishment that is not at all commensurate with and far out of proportion to their acts to state the truth. We urge this court to immediately and unconditionally release them all from any further proceedings.
Sincerely,
Donations can be sent to the
"The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment