Friends,
When a defendant accused of breaking and entering gets on the witness stand, s/he can discuss her/his intent. This is for obvious reasons, as the defendant might have a legitimate reason and thus was not acting out of criminal intent. However, when it is a protester on the witness stand, invariably the judge could care less about "intent." And here is another federal judge ignorant of international law and the
Kagiso,
Max
News Release 3/4/2010 Immediate Release
Leonard Eiger, 425-445-2190, subversivepeacemaking@comcast.net
www.gzcenter.org or <info@gzcenter.org>
Nuclear Weapons Resister Found Guilty of Trespassing at
Nuclear weapons resister Lynne Greenwald was tried in
District Court,
of trespassing on Federal government property. Magistrate Judge Karen
L. Strombom presided over
Greenwald was charged with trespassing/entering a restricted area
(violation of 18 USC 1382) during a vigil and nonviolent action at
Naval Base
a banner that read “Abolish Nuclear Weapons: Resist Trident” as part
of Ground Zero’s Aug 10th recognition of the 64th Anniversary of the
Greenwald, who represented herself at the trial, presented the
following opening statement: “I will provide testimony that any action
on August 10, 2009 at the Trident Nuclear Submarine Base, was not
illegal, but was in fact an act of upholding International and
Humanitarian Laws as well as the
reveal that there was no intent to commit a crime, but based on my
understanding of these laws as they relate to war and specifically
nuclear weapons, actions were taken this day to uphold these laws and
to prevent further criminal acts by my government.”
The government presented its case based on Greenwald entering the base
during a demonstration on May 15, 2006, in which she was arrested and
presented with a barment letter. The prosecutor stated that Greenwald
was warned at that time that any further trespass on Federal property
would result in her arrest and possible prosecution under Federal
code. The prosecutor also documented the events relating to the
August 10 trespass.
Greenwald attempted to provide personal testimony, giving the reasons
for her actions. She began by stating that the Trident submarine is a
first strike weapon, and that any use of such a weapon is a crime
under international law. The judge interrupted Greenwald during her
testimony, and instructed her that the “only question before the court
is regarding trespass.” Greenwald reiterated her belief that she
“crossed the blue line not to commit a crime, but to uphold
international law. I believe that the authority of international
humanitarian law requires me to take such action.”
After the prosecution made its closing statement in which it
recognized Greenwald’s right to protest outside the base, but that she
has no right to enter government property I doing so, Greenwald read
her closing statement: “An act of civil resistance to prevent the
ongoing commission of crimes under well recognized principles of
International Law and US domestic constitutional and criminal laws was
taken on August 10, 2009 at the Trident Nuclear Submarine Base in
citizen of the
Principle to prevent continued violation of International Laws. I
testified that I was compelled by a good-faith belief that by taking
reasonable, nonviolent and affirmative acts to directly confront and
to oppose the commission of crimes by the
was in fact justified in entering this Navy Base by the basic
principles of International Law. The Court must find me not guilty of
any criminal act.”
Judge Strombold, in handing down sentencing, stated that this was a
classic case of rights to speak and protest, and that she did not
believe that the Nuremburg Principles justify trespassing on
government property. She also stated that international law
principles are not an issue in this case; the law of trespass does not
recognize international law. Her final point was that the “defense
raised here is not a legal defense that can be used in this case.”
Judge Strombold found Greenwald guilty of trespass, and ordered a
sentencing report before Greenwald’s sentencing hearing scheduled for
May 5, 2010.
Approximately 25 supporters of Greenwald held a pre-trial vigil
outside the courthouse, and many were in the courtroom to witness the
trial.
Greenwald is also a member of the Disarm Now Plowshares group of five
that entered the
November 2, 2009, All Souls Day, with the intention of calling
attention to the illegality and immorality of the existence of the
Trident weapons system. http://disarmnowplowshares.wordpress.com/
All five made their way to and entered the Strategic Weapons
Facility-Pacific (SWFPAC) where
stored. Before being arrested they held a banner saying, “Disarm Now
Plowshares: Trident: Illegal + Immoral”, left a trail of blood and
hammered on the roadway (
the fences around SWFPAC. They also scattered sunflower seeds
throughout the base. The initial charges brought against the Disarm
Now five were abruptly vacated, and no new charges have yet been
filed.
Lynne Greenwald is a mother, grandmother and social worker, as well as
a member of
education, training in nonviolence, community-building, resistance
against Trident and action toward a world without nuclear weapons.
###
No comments:
Post a Comment