Monday, March 30, 2009

Three Mile Island, The NRC And Obama

Three Mile Island, The NRC And Obama

It was thirty years ago this week that the Unit 2

reactor of the Three Mile Island (TMI) nuclear

power plant began a partial meltdown. As its fuel

rods began to burn out of control, a hydrogen

bubble formed, causing a small explosion.

By Christian Parenti

The Nation

March 27, 2009

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090413/parenti

 

During the accident, plant operators were myopically

glued to their instruments, which were incorrectly

indicating that a crucial pressure valve was closed. In

fact, it was open and draining coolant from the plant's

core, thus causing it to burn out of control. When the

shift changed, someone on the new crew had the presence

of mind to check the temperature on the reactor's

effluent pipe. It was way too hot. That meant the

crucial pressure valve--which read "closed" on the

monitors--was actually wide open.

 

The crisis was eventually brought under control. How

narrow the margin of error. That accident was

bad--43,000 curies of krypton radiation were released--

but it could have been catastrophic.

 

One reason more radiation was not released was because

"paranoid" anti-nuke activists worried that the plant,

built directly in the flight path of the Harrisburg

airport, could be hit by a jet. They demanded a very

strong containment shell be built over the reactor. As a

result, TMI had one of the strongest such protective

seals in the country. Had the meltdown not been caught

when it was and had there not been a containment shell,

the whole Northeast could have become a fallout zone for

10,000 years thereafter. It would have been like those

Chernobyl fallout zones: a radioactive wilderness; a

national sacrifice zone; devastation akin to Sherman's

March, except permanent. America would have been reduced

to a rump version of itself.

 

It is fitting to reflect on the TMI accident because in

the face of climate change there is still much unhinged

talk about a nuclear renaissance. During the 2008

presidential campaign, John McCain called for forty-five

new nuke plants to be built. Barack Obama, while less

specific, also pledged federal subsidies to help build

atomic power plants.

 

As I have reported in these pages, this second wave of

state-of-the-art atomic power plant construction is pure

fantasy. No one wants to invest in nukes, despite

government guarantees to cover 80 percent of the costs

if the projects default. No one will insure them. They

will not be built. However, underneath this nuclear

renaissance discourse lurks the real danger: while we

debate the fantasy qualities of a new fleet of plants

that will never be built, a handful of companies that

own the existing fleet of decrepit old zombie plants are

quietly pushing these reactors to the very edge of their

capacity and beyond.

 

There are 103 reactors in sixty-four locations across

the United States. None of these reactors were designed

to last more than forty years. We are reaching that

deadline. But companies like Entergy and Exelon have

been demanding and receiving dangerous license

extensions and so-called power "uprates". These

companies are insisting that the plants be allowed to

run for sixty years rather than forty, and that they be

allowed to run the plants at 120 percent of their

designed capacity. The companies are doing this to

extract every last penny of profit from the old

reactors. During the Bush years, the NRC relicensed

forty of the country's reactors. In those eight years,

the NRC did not deny a single renewal request. This is

unconscionably reckless behavior. The regulators of this

industry would appear to be somnambulant hostages to the nuke operators.

 

President Obama has an opportunity to address this

gathering crisis. Though he supported atomic power

subsidies during his campaign, he has not come out in

support of relicensing old plants--this, after all, is

the crucial issue. Subsidies don't matter because no one

is going to build new plants. Relicensing, on the other

hand, is a real and present danger. There are two

positions open on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and

President Obama has yet to make any appointments. For

the sake of sanity and safety he must use his NRC

appointments to oppose relicensing. And at the top of

the NRC's agenda should be shutting and decommissioning

the nation's remaining fleet of Three Mile Island-era nuke plants.

 

Christian Parenti, a frequent contributor to The Nation

on international affairs, is the author of The Freedom:

Shadows and Hallucinations in Occupied Iraq (New Press).

 

_____________________________________________

 

No comments: